Навіщо VARCHAR

навіщо

Univerbation of на ( na ) +‎ ві́що ( víščo ) , variant of що ( ščo ) . Corresponds to Belarusian навошта ( navóšta ) .

Pronunciation edit

Adverb edit

наві́що • ( navíščo )

  1. why, what for, to what end Near-synonym: чому́ ( čomú ) Наві́щотобі́цепотрі́бно?Navíščo tobí ce potríbno?Why do you need this? What do you need this for?

Usage notes edit

  • наві́що ( navíščo ) and чому́ ( čomú ) can both be translated as “Why?”, but they differ in that чому́ means “For what reason?/On what grounds?” whereas наві́що means “For what purpose?/To what end?”. Sometimes the words are interchangeable, but sometimes one is more appropriate than the other.

References edit

  • Bilodid, I. K., editor (1970–1980), “навіщо”, in Словник української мови: в 11 т. [ Dictionary of the Ukrainian Language: in 11 vols ] (in Ukrainian), Kyiv: Naukova Dumka

VARCHAR

In SQL, VARCHAR is a data type used to represent character string values of variable length. The term VARCHAR stands for Variable Character. It is one of the most commonly used data types in SQL, especially for storing textual data such as names, addresses, and descriptions.

Syntax

The syntax for defining a VARCHAR data type is as follows:

Example

Here, length is the maximum number of characters that can be stored in the VARCHAR column. For example, if you want to create a table with a column to store names, where the maximum length of the name is 50 characters, you can use the following SQL command:

CREATE TABLE students ( id INT PRIMARY KEY, name VARCHAR(50) );

In this example, the name column is defined as a VARCHAR data type with a maximum length of 50 characters. This means that any value stored in the name column can be up to 50 characters long.

You can also use the VARCHAR data type in SQL queries to filter and search for specific values. For example, to select all the students with names starting with “J”, you can use the following query:

SELECT * FROM students WHERE name LIKE 'J%';

This query selects all the rows from the students table where the name column starts with the letter “J”. The % symbol is a wildcard that matches any number of characters, so this query selects all names that start with “J” regardless of their length.

One of the advantages of using VARCHAR over a fixed-length character data type like CHAR is that it allows for more efficient storage of data. With VARCHAR, the database system only allocates enough space to store the actual string value, rather than allocating a fixed amount of storage regardless of the actual length of the string. This can lead to significant space savings, especially when storing large amounts of text data.

It’s important to note that VARCHAR is not suitable for storing binary data, such as images or executable code.

In addition to specifying the maximum length of the VARCHAR column, it’s also possible to set a minimum length using the optional keyword CHECK. For example, VARCHAR(50) CHECK (LEN(column_name) >= 3) would specify a minimum length of 3 characters for the column.

In summary, VARCHAR is a flexible data type used for storing variable-length character data in SQL. Its efficient storage characteristics make it a popular choice for storing textual data, while its flexibility allows for precise control over the maximum and minimum length of the stored strings.

SQL Tutorial

  • SQL queries
  • SQL constraints
  • TINYINT
  • SQL Server autoincrement
  • Select rows with max value
  • SQL TOP
  • SQL HAVING COUNT
  • SQL remove duplicates
  • SQL MERGE
  • SQL TCL statements
  • SQL DML statements
  • SQL DDL statements
  • SQL Recursive CTE
  • SQL PIVOT
  • Dynamic SQL
  • EXEC statement
  • SQL procedure with parameters
  • SQL Procedure vs Function
  • SQL Table-Valued functions
  • SQL Scalar functions
  • SQL User-defined functions
  • ALTER FUNCTION
  • CREATE FUNCTION
  • ALTER PROCEDURE
  • SQL Stored procedures
  • CREATE PROCEDURE
  • Alter trigger
  • Alter view
  • SQL SET TRANSACTION
  • SQL SAVEPOINT

SQL Server differences of char, nchar, varchar and nvarchar data types

The differences of SQL Server char, nchar, varchar and nvarchar are frequently discussed not just during interviews, but also by developers during discussions on database design. In this tip I would like to share not only the basic differences, but also what we need to know and be aware of when using each data type.

Solution

Char, nchar, varchar and nvarchar are all used to store text or string data in SQL Server databases.

  • char – is the SQL-92 synonym for character. Data is padded with blanks/spaces to fill the field size. Fixed length data type.
  • nchar – is the SQL-92 synonym for national char and national character. Fixed length data type.
  • varchar – is the SQL-92 synonym for character varying. Variable length data type.
  • nvarchar – is the SQL-92 synonym for national char varying and national character varying. Variable length data type.

What does N mean in SQL Server

You might wonder what the N stands for? N stands for National Language Character Set and is used to specify a Unicode string. When using Unicode data types, a column can store any character defined by the Unicode Standard, which includes all of the characters defined in the various character sets. Note that Unicode data types take twice as much storage space as non-Unicode data types.

Unicode is typically used in database applications which are designed to facilitate code pages which extend beyond the English and Western Europe code pages. It is designed so that extended character sets can still “fit” into database columns. What this means is that Unicode character data types are limited to half the space, because each byte actually takes two bytes to store the data (Unicode is sometimes referred to as “double-wide”). SQL Server has supported Unicode since SQL Server 7.0 by providing nchar/nvarchar/ntext data types. SQL Server doesn’t support UTF-8 encoding for Unicode data, but it does support UTF-16 encoding.

I made a table below that will serve as a quick reference.

Differences of char, nchar, varchar and nvarchar in SQL Server

charncharvarcharnvarchar
Character Data TypeNon-Unicode fixed-lengthUnicode fixed-length can store both non-Unicode and Unicode characters (i.e. Japanese, Korean etc.)Non-Unicode variable lengthUnicode variable length can store both non-Unicode and Unicode characters (i.e. Japanese, Korean etc.)
Maximum Lengthup to 8,000 charactersup to 4,000 charactersup to 8,000 charactersup to 4,000 characters
Character Sizetakes up 1 byte per charactertakes up 2 bytes per Unicode/Non-Unicode charactertakes up 1 byte per charactertakes up 2 bytes per Unicode/Non-Unicode character
Storage Sizen bytes2 times n bytesActual Length (in bytes)2 times Actual Length (in bytes)
Usageuse when data length is constant or fixed length columnsuse only if you need Unicode support such as the Japanese Kanji or Korean Hangul characters due to storage overheadused when data length is variable or variable length columns and if actual data is always way less than capacityuse only if you need Unicode support such as the Japanese Kanji or Korean Hangul characters due to storage overhead
query that uses a varchar parameter does an index seek due to column collation setsquery that uses a nvarchar parameter does an index scan due to column collation sets

Advantages and Disadvantages of char, nchar, varchar and nvarchar in SQL Server

Data TypesAdvantagesDisadvantages
charQuery performance is better since no need to move the column while updating.

With the growth and innovation of web applications, it is even more important to support client computers that are running different locales. The easiest way to manage character data in international databases is to always use the Unicode nchar, nvarchar, and ntext data types, instead of their non-Unicode equivalents, char, varchar, and text.

Unicode is a standard for mapping code points to characters. Because it is designed to cover all the characters of all the languages of the world, there is no need for different code pages to handle different sets of characters. SQL Server supports the Unicode Standard, Version 3.2. If all the applications that work with international databases also use Unicode variables instead of non-Unicode variables, character translations do not have to be performed anywhere in the system. Clients will see the same characters in the data as all other clients.

SQL Server stores all textual system catalog data in columns having Unicode data types. The names of database objects, such as tables, views, and stored procedures, are stored in Unicode columns. This enables applications to be developed by using only Unicode, and helps avoid issues with code page conversions.

Remember when developing new applications to consider if it will be used globally because this will help you determine whether to use nchar and nvarchar to support different languages.

Next Steps

Learn more by reading and exploring the following:

  • Take time to read this tip too which might help you in planning your database design Defining Data Types and Sizes
  • Learn more about the importance of data type consistency SQL Server Data Type Consistency
  • Comparing SQL Server and Oracle datatypes
  • If you have an application you plan to take globally try exploring with global characters. Who knows if you are successful you might increase your sales and take your apps to the next level.
About the author

Sherlee Dizon is an IT consultant and web application developer with over 14 years of experience as a software and web developer.

This author pledges the content of this article is based on professional experience and not AI generated.

Comments For This Article

I would like to know if it is possible to store more than one extra foreign language in addition to English in a NCHAR or NVARCHAR data types ?

I would not think so.�

@Dman2306 – your recommendation to always use NCHAR/NVARCHAR due to UNICODE, can be extremely detrimental to SQL Server query performance. Disk storage is not the only thing impacted by a data type decision. That storage cost compounds in numerous other ways. Wider records means less records can be stored in an 8KB data page construct. And all work done by SQL Server are done via pages, not records. More data pages to consume & process for a query equates to more I/O, both reading & writing from disk, but also impacts RAM usage (due to storage of those data pages in the buffer pool). Wider data types also impacts the amount of transaction log that must be written for a given DML query. If you’re in Azure, there is a direct dollar cost correlation to the amount of data you are moving around.

If you don’t believe me regarding the above, go Google for my Every Byte Counts: Why Your Data Type Choices Matter presentation. There are two (older) recordings of it available online. Watch it and hopefully you will gain a better apprecation as to why one should right size your data types.

“query that uses a varchar parameter does an index seek due to column collation sets”

“query that uses a nvarchar parameter does an index scan due to column collation sets”

These two statements are misleading. They indicate that queries that use varchar/nvarchar will only ever result in a seek/scan operation respectively. That is not accurate. When it comes to data types, what impacts seek vs scan is whether the underlying data types match.
nchar/nvarchar = nchar/nvarchar -> seek
char/varchar = char/varchar -> seek
char/varchar = nchar/nvarchar -> scan due to implicit conversion

The “Table of Differences” is not accurate for variable character data types (varchar and nvarchar). Both have two additional bytes for storage. If your string is 5 chracters, varchar requires 7 bytes for varchar and 12 bytes for nvarchar. If using varchar(max) or nvarchar(max), an additional 24 bytes is required. See https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms176089(v=sql.110).aspx and https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms186939(v=sql.110).aspx.

I very much disagree with your statement of “use only if you need Unicode support such as the Japanese Kanji or Korean Hangul characters due to storage overhead”. This is shortsighted and exactly what leads to problems like the Y2K fiasco. I have built MANY applications that at the time I built them, were US English only. Then, suddenly, we got an overseas customer. Now I had the task of tracking down every char/varchar, not just in tables, but in sprocs, udfs, etc. and changing them all to Unicode. Then of course making sure we didn’t break anything. However, if the developers had the foresight to just support Unicode from the getgo there would have been no issues. Yes, Unicode uses more storage space, but storage space is cheap these days. It is the reason why languages like C#/VB.NET don’t even support ASCII strings natively! My recommendation is ALWAYS use nvarchar/nchar unless you are 100% CERTAIN that the field will NEVER require any non-western European characters (e.g. an alphanumeric id that is only allowed 0-9,a-Z). Otherwise, years from now, when your salesmen begin selling outside of the English speaking world you’re going to have a daunting refactoring task ahead of you.